Forex Blog

January 5, 2011

Interest Rate Outlook for 2011

Filed under: OANDA News — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , — admin @ 4:22 pm

With a new year upon us, currency traders are once again turning to the old crystal ball in an attempt to predict interest rate actions for the major economies. While there are many storylines to watch as 2011 unfolds, two narratives in particular are expected to garner the most attention – the long-awaited recovery in the US, and the ongoing credit crisis in the Eurozone.

US Economy to Stabilize But Remains Vulnerable

The final quarter of 2010 did provide reason for guarded optimism that the US economy was finally on the path to recovery. The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Index confirmed that factory production continued to rise in December while the construction industry was also showing signs of life. Both sectors are integral to a sustained recovery.

On the negative side however, it is clear that the pace of recovery will be significantly slower than experienced in previous recoveries. The main reason for this is unemployment which stubbornly refuses to subside.
The year ended with an unemployment rate of 9.7 percent prompting Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke to admit that it could take four or five years before unemployment falls to the typical range of 5 to 6 percent. In response to the more pessimistic employment outlook, the Federal Reserve downgraded its 2011 forecast from a range of 3.4 to 4.2 percent, to a more modest 3.0 to 3.6 percent growth.

The fact that the Fed has reduced its growth projections for 2011 suggests there is now even less appetite for a hike in interest rates than just a few months ago. Bernanke has been very transparent saying on more than one occasion that the Fed is prepared to keep rates in the range of zero to 0.25 percent for an “extended” period of time if necessary.

With all this in mind, it is difficult to imagine the Fed will entertain thoughts of a rate increase in the near term. For these reasons, most analysts believe US interest rates will remain at the current level for at least the first half of 2011.

Debt Concerns Remain for Eurozone

First it was Greece requiring emergency funding to meet its debt obligations, and then it was Ireland. The big question now is, “who’s next”?

Most are betting on Portugal, but some money is also being placed on one of the larger economies such as Spain or even France. While we can’t say for sure which country will be next in line for emergency funding, or even if the need for another bailout is certain, what we can say is that just the rumor of another Eurozone insolvency will further hammer the reeling euro.

Germany, and to a lesser degree some of the northern countries including Finland, Sweden, and newly-admitted Estonia, are expected to lead the Eurozone countries in 2011. Still the majority of countries are expected to lag or even decline, and some of this will be the result of fiscal rebalancing to address severe budget deficits. Some analysts even worry that overly-zealous governments could cut too much, too quickly, thereby running the risk of tipping the Eurozone back into recession.

The more pressing matter however is the coming slowdown in demand for Germany’s exports many analysts suggest is unavoidable later this year.

Germany has been the brightest star in the Eurozone galaxy for 2010, but its luster is expected to diminish as its largest export markets in the US and Britain are both reeling from their own economic problems. In the US, the painfully slow reversal in job losses has consumers sitting on their hands, while growth is expected to stagnate in Britain as the government implements dramatic spending cuts with more tax increases in the works to deal with a huge deficit.

The likely outcome is that even if the Eurozone manages to fend off any further sovereign insolvencies, the economy is still expected to slow. This has the European Central Bank backing away from the rate hike trial balloon it floated during the third quarter when ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet hinted that a rate increase could soon be necessary. There has been no further talk of monetary tightening since then and most analysts believe the rate will remain at 1 percent well into 2011.

Great Britain Deals With Its Own Debt Problems

With the toppling of the Labor party in last fall’s election, it appears that the populace finally realized the need to gain control of the nation’s finances. While the election resulted in a coalition government led by the Conservative party and supported by the Liberal Democrats, targeting the growing debt was a central theme during the election.

Within a few weeks of being elected, the new government announced plans to reduce the deficit from ten percent of GDP, to somewhere in the range of two percent. This will necessitate cutting roughly 83 billion pounds (US$130 billion) from the budget.

The British economy has actually been increasing at an inflationary rate exceeding the two percent target rate for much of the past year. However, most of this activity is due to a recent increase in the VAT consumer tax and a sharp bump in energy prices. With deep government cutbacks coupled with more tax increases, consumer spending in other sectors will probably decline making it doubtful that the Bank of England will seek to increase lending rates until it becomes more apparent how the proposed spending cuts will affect the economy.

Yen Appreciation Remains Japan’s Top Currency Concern

Like Germany, Japan is an exporting nation, and as an exporting nation, Japan faces the delicate balance of currency valuation verses export sales. For Japan, the task facing the monetary authorities is to curtail the yen’s appreciation against the currencies of its two largest trading partners – namely, the dollar and the euro.

To be blunt, 2010 was yet another failing year as the yen made significant gains on both currencies.

At the beginning of 2010, one US dollar could purchase the equivalent of 92. 58 yen but by the end of the year, one dollar could purchase only 81.25 yen. This means that for the US consumer, the appreciation of the yen during 2010 represents a loss of buying power of more than 14 percent for the course of the year. Against the euro, the yen’s gains were even greater appreciating more than 20 percent.

When foreign buyers convert their own currency to the yen, this naturally increases overall demand for the currency. This demand alone has helped push the yen higher and over the years has enticed savers and investors to buy yen to avoid the volatility plaguing most other currencies in recent years, contributing even further to demand.

This phenomenon is not new and since the mid- 70s, the yen has continued to outpace the dollar. In 1975, one US dollar could buy over 300 yen compared to the 80 or so yen one dollar will buy in early 2011. It is this long track record of growth against the US dollar, that has contributed to the yen’s reputation as a “safe” store of value and is particularly attractive for investors.

To combat this, the Bank of Japan has maintained a low interest rate policy for more than two decades with the current rate paying just 0.03 percent interest. Even this drastic move has failed to reduce demand and with no change in yen demand expected this year, the Bank of Japan has little choice but to maintain its long-running low interest monetary policy.

Commodities to Push “Other” Dollars Higher

Boosted by demand in China for commodities including potash and other minerals as well as Canada’s crude oil sales to the US, the Canadian and Australian economies both made significant gains during 2010. As a result, Canada and Australia were the only major economies to raise interest rates during the year.

The two currencies certainly lived up to their billing as “commodity currencies” making strong gains against the greenback with both closing 2010 above parity with the US dollar. The Canadian dollar gained 5.3 percent during the year while the Aussie dollar jumped a whopping 13.6 percent.

To quell the impact rising commodity prices have had on their economies, both Central Banks found it necessary to invoke several rate increases during the past year. The Bank of Canada implemented three separate rate hikes bringing the overnight rate from 0.25 percent to 1 percent while Australia was even more aggressive lifting its benchmark interest rate to a class-leading 4.75 percent.

In recent months however, the rate of growth has slowed in both countries but particularly in Canada which has a greater dependence on the US market. Weaker demand for Canadian products in the US has translated to an easing of inflation and it appears that the Bank of Canada will maintain the current rate of 1 percent until the growth picture in Canada becomes clearer.

The China Syndrome

Not lost in this discussion, is the important role China will continue to play in the global economy in 2011. The People’s Bank of China deliberately keeps the yuan valued well below its true market price to enhance the competiveness of China’s exports. Much to America’s chagrin, it is unlikely that China is about to forego this tactic anytime soon. What could force China to rethink its yuan valuation policy however, is the threat of inflation and further efforts on China’s part to contain inflation is an important barometer to watch.

In the second half of 2010, China was forced to raise interest rates and allow the yuan to appreciate somewhat as the Bank of China tightened monetary policy to ease inflationary strains on the economy. Looking forward to 2011, inflation is expected to remain a worry and in addition to moves to limit “hot” foreign investment money from flooding the market, additional interest rate increases are very much in scope for the new year.

December 21, 2010

UK government borrowing hits record high

The amount of new public sector borrowing hit a fresh record high in November, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

Net borrowing totalled £23.3bn last month, up from £17.4bn a year ago, and more than analysts had expected.

The borrowing figure was pushed higher by increased spending on health, defence and the EU.

The latest figures are likely to raise concerns about the government’s efforts to reduce the UK’s budget deficit.

While the government spent 10.8% more in November than the same month last year, its VAT receipts fell 0.1%.
Rogue figure?

A Treasury spokesman said: “November’s borrowing figures show why the government has had to take decisive action to take Britain out of the financial danger zone.

“These outturns are also in line with the Office of Budget Responsibility’s latest forecast for borrowing to fall by almost £10bn this year compared to last, and for tax receipts to increase by over 7% year-on-year.”

The ONS said public sector net debt now stood at 58% of UK GDP.

BBC News

October 20, 2010

UK Announces Bank Levy

As part of sweeping spending cuts announced by Chancellor George Osborne, a new bank levy will be applied to British banks. Full details will be disclosed in the next few days, but the government expects to generate £2.5 billion (US$3.9 billion) a year.

Saying he wanted the banks to make a fair contribution, the Chancellor said that the new legislation would “extract the maximum sustainable tax revenues from financial services”.

“We neither want to let banks off making their fair contribution, nor do we want to drive them abroad,” said Osborne.

“Many hundreds of thousands of jobs across the whole United Kingdom depend on Britain being a competitive place for financial services,” he added.

Source: BBC News

Canadian Wholesale Prices Jump 1.2%

Statistics Canada said today that wholesale prices increased 1.2 percent to $44.5 billion in August. This was the largest single-month increase since January with the largest increase coming in the machinery, equipment and supplies sub-sector, which climbed 3.2 per cent to $9.4 billion.

Source: The Canadian Press

September 22, 2010

BoE Minutes Shows Only One Vote for Rate Increase

Minutes from the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee show that only one MPC member voted in favor of a rate increase at the committee’s meeting on September 9th. The Bank is required to maintain a target inflation rate of 2 percent but latest figures has inflation at 3.1 percent.

Despite the increase in inflation, Britain’s recovery remains fragile and while an increase in interest rates is the typical response to high inflation, the fear is that a rate increase could further erode business and consumer confidence.

Source: Associated Press

June 30, 2010

Krugman Uses the “D” Word

It has only been two days since the wrap-up of the G20 meeting, but already, second-guessing has shifted into high gear. Two statements in particular caught the attention of the markets; the first of these, officially removed the concept of a global “bank tax” off the table. The second, put forward a timeline for reducing government stimulus spending.

The axing of a coordinated bank tax came as no surprise. It was clear that some countries wanted to move forward on charging a levy, while others were vehemently against it. As it stands now, individual countries will act as they see fit. The agreement around spending and deficits on the other hand, presents a far more interesting story line; interesting because some big names are lining up publically to trash the idea.

In his article published earlier this week in the New York Times, economist Paul Krugman argued the point that this is the worst possible time to worry about deficits. In his view, moving too quickly from undisciplined spend-thrifts (my words) to fiscally-responsible penny-pinchers (again, my words), is the very formula that led to the depression of the 1930s. Krugman believes that failing to maintain spending levels, can only result in one outcome.

“We are now, I fear, in the early stages of a third depression,” writes Krugman, a depression brought about by a “failure of policy”.

Seriously? A depression?

According to Krugman, there have been two previous depressions. One in the 1870s, and the “Great Depression” of the 1930s. Krugman believes we are following the same path that preceded the last depression. So, at the risk of oversimplifying the causes of the last depression, let’s look at the major contributors that brought about the depression, and look for commonality with today’s situation:

1. Loss of Market Valuation and Bank Failures

As the stock market lost value – approximately $40 billion within the two months following the so-called “Great Crash” – a series of bank failures were triggered. Even by today’s standards, $40 billion is a lot of cash – imagine what it meant to the economy in 1930 when US GDP was just over $91 billion.

2. Decline in Public and Government Spending

Naturally, a loss equal to about 43 percent of the country’s total yearly GDP, resulted in severe deflation. The lower demand for goods and services had a devastating impact on employment, and as more people found themselves out of work, spending fell even further.

3. American Economic Policy

In order to protect businesses in America’s important manufacturing sector, the government introduced the Smoot-Hawley Tariff in 1930. The intent was to impose duties on imported goods in a bid to make US products more attractive for domestic consumers. As should have been predicted, other countries retaliated with similar tariffs, making American goods less competitive globally. The domestic market lacked the capacity to pick up the slack of the lost foreign sales, reducing further, overall demand.

The common theme these three contributing factors share is that they all lead to reduced spending. In his book “Essays on the Great Depression”, Bernanke placed much of the blame for the depression on economic policy that neglected to protect failing banks, while at the same time, allowing the supply of money and credit to contract.

Despite the public backlash sure to follow, Bernanke was not about to allow the same thing under his watch. Banks were rescued and stimulus money was spent. Given his recent remarks committed to the continuance of an expansionary policy, it is obvious that Bernanke and Krugman are in agreement that governments must continue to support the recovery.

After Years of Spending, Why the Sudden Swing Now to Deficit Cutting?

Of course, not everyone agrees with this approach. Several countries in Europe find themselves face to face with out-of-control deficits. Spooked by the sovereign debt crisis in Europe, Germany, and most recently Great Britain, have opted to follow a self-imposed austerity path to reduce government debt. Germany’s budget last month, includes 80 billion euros (US$107 billion) in spending cuts, while the David Cameron-led coalition in Britain, has also announced significant spending reductions as well as steep tax increases.

I don’t believe anyone an argue against the need to reign in deficits; rather, I think it is the timing that concerns critics. Certainly, countries cannot continue to rack up massive deficits each year, but nor is it to anyone’s advantage to choke off a recovery before it has chance to gain greater traction. This would, to use Krugman’s words, be a “failure of policy”.

“Around the world”, notes Krugnam, “most recently at last weekend’s deeply discouraging G20 meeting – governments are obsessing about inflation when the real threat is deflation, preaching the need for belt-tightening when the real problem is inadequate spending.”

In the end, a compromise was reached that enabled all the G8 countries, with the exception of Japan, to find language they could support. The solution proposed by Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, and supported by President Obama, called for a continuation of the planned stimulus spending in the short-term, with a longer-term goal of reducing deficits by 50 percent within three years.

It is hoped I’m sure, that the pledge to maintain spending to be followed by deficit cutting later on, sends a positive message to the markets. However, I fear that what is still missing, is a stronger commitment to a coordinated approach to ensuring sufficient stimulus over the next six to eight months.

The UK has already passed a budget to reduce spending, as has Germany. Greece has had austerity measures forced upon it in exchange for receiving emergency funding, thereby setting a precedent for other EU countries like Spain and Portugal on the brink of needing their own emergency bail-out. No matter what was promised in Toronto, it appears that Europe is determined to scale back on spending.

June 11, 2010

Britain’s Deputy PM Says EU Instability Threatens Recovery

Britain’s newly-minted Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, referred to instability within the European Union as the “greatest threat” to economic recovery within Britain.

“Our economies are intertwined. Other EU countries are the UK’s biggest trading partners by some distance – around half of all our exports go to the EU and over half our inward investment comes from there,” Clegg said during a conference in Madrid. “That means that economic and financial difficulties in the eurozone directly affect Britain. Indeed continuing instability and a lack of growth on our doorstep is the greatest threat to our own economic recovery. Quite simply slow growth in the eurozone means fewer British exports, slower British growth, fewer British jobs.”

Source: AFP News

April 19, 2010

Goldman Sachs and Abacus – Something’s Not Adding Up

The news just keep getting worse for Goldman Sachs. Now, Britain’s financial regulator, the Financial Services Authority (FSA), is following the SEC’s lead and has announced it will also launch its own investigation into Goldman’s Abacus project.

Since last Friday when the SEC first issued its communiqué that it was probing Goldman Sach’s use of Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs), Abacus has become ground zero as the cause of the global recession. While this may be a bit of an exaggeration, the SEC claims that Goldman Sachs did knowingly sell billions in repackaged debt as investment grade, when they were in fact, backed by poor quality, subprime mortgages that were actually designed to fail. That’s right – designed to fail.

Worse still, Goldman and a handful of hedge funds profited directly by shorting these securities, knowing full well that the CDOs would lose value as the underlying mortgages defaulted. According to the SEC, Abacus worked like this.

Hedge funds including Paulson & Co. – which started life in the early 1970s when “Chet” Paulson founded Paulson Capital Corp. – approached Goldman Sachs to help them structure a series of CDOs. Paulson would select the underlying securities and these were based almost entirely on mortgages expected to suffer from a high default rate. After receiving the Goldman Sachs stamp of approval, Goldman sold slices of the new CDO as investment grade to unsuspecting investors, knowing full well that the CDO was actually far below investment grade. Goldman also knew that Paulson was shorting the CDOs as they fully expected them to lose value once the true nature of the mortgages became known.

The SEC is conducting its investigation on the basis that Goldman Sachs was negligent in both how it represented the CDOs, and also that it failed to provide material information to investors regarding the involvement of the hedge funds. In other words, Goldman failed to disclose that a hedge fund was responsible for selecting the composition of the CDOs, and that the hedge fund was then betting that the CDOs would tank. Given the seriousness of these accusations and the fact that insiders actually went to the SEC with details, it is hard to believe that Goldman will get through this unscathed.

Some damage has already become apparent and has had a negative impact on Goldman’s share price. This past Friday, Goldman stock was trading at just under $185 a share. Once the SEC announced its investigation however, the share price started falling, and by Monday morning, had lost nearly 20% with no support yet in sight. American and European stock markets have also lost ground as investors wait for more news.

For the more cynical amongst us, there are some who feel this is justified payback for Goldman earning $13.4 billion in profit last year, with much of it as we are now learning, stemming from questionable practices. Public opinion is also teetering against Goldman as more details come to light. British PM Gordon Brown, who is in the middle of an election campaign, is clearly framing this as just further evidence that the actions of big business were directly responsible for causing the global recession.

Brown went on record this morning saying that he was “shocked” at the allegations against Goldman Sachs, while at the same time, referring to the paying of huge bonuses to top Goldman executives as “moral bankruptcy”. In the U.S. where the shift towards greater regulation of the financial industry is growing stronger, this will undoubtedly be seen as further justification for tighter restrictions on the investment industry.

February 3, 2010

UK Service Sector Slows Down which could signal a Dip in Growth

Activity in Britain’s dominant services sector slowed more than expected last month as the worst snowfall in 50 years paralysed the country.

The Chartered Institute of Purchasing & Supply’s purchasing managers’ index (PMI) fell to 54.5 in January, from 56.8 the previous month. A mark above 50 signifies growth as opposed to contraction. Analysts had forecast a reading of 56.5. This is in sharp contrast to CIPS’s manufacturing figures released earlier this week, which showed that the sector grew at its fastest pace in 15 years last month.

David Noble, chief executive officer at CIPS, said: “This may be a temporary blip caused by one-off events rather than signs of a double-dip recession, but we can’t dismiss the possibility.

“The chaos caused by the snow hit this sector particularly hard, much more than manufacturing or construction, reducing the growth rates of activity and new business wins.”

Guardian

October 23, 2009

UK Economy Shrinks Another 0.4 Percent

For the first time since Gross Domestic Product (GDP) figures were first recorded in 1955, Britain’s economy suffered its sixth consecutive quarter of declining growth, falling another 0.4 percent from July to September. Since the beginning of the recession, the economy has contracted a total of 5.9 percent.

BBC News

« Newer Posts

Powered by Efacilitators Hosting